Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. United Collieries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1938No. 5316PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

From the allegations in the petition, all of which wore admitted by the defendant, and from .the stipulation of the parties it appeared that the plaintiff, a common carrier of freight by railroad, accepted two shipments of coal at Weirton, West Virginia, to be transported to Detroit, Michigan. The Hanna Coal Co. was the consignor or shipper in each instance. It was also the consignee in one instance. In the other, the consignes was United Collieries, Inc., the defendant. In the one instance in which The Hanna Coal Co. was ’.he consignee, it ordered delivery to be made to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Cleveland C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MarcellettiMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. F. E. Mathias Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Illinois Cent. R. v. Western Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API