Legal Opinion

Federated Rural Electric Insurance Co. v. Kessler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 84-552PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issues in this case are: (1) whether Federated Rural Electric Insurance Company's (Federated) rule prohibiting the romantic association of any employee of one sex with a married employee of the opposite sex impermissibly discriminates on the basis of marital status. The Madison Equal Opportunities Commission concluded that the rule violated Madison's equal opportunities ordinance, and that Federated discharged Kessler "in part" because he violated the rule.(2) If the employer's rule does impermissibly discriminate on the basis of marital status, then the issue is whether to apply the "in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Whitney v. Greater New York Corp. of Seventh-Day AdventistsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Muskego-Norway Consolidated Schools Joint School District No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Harris v. Annuity & Pension BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. County of Dane v. NormanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hoell v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. Sturgis v. Winnebago County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. Hon. Cesar J. Almodovar Marchany v. G.P. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API