Legal Opinion

Stein v. Doran

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 15, 1930No. 4248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of Kirkpatrick, District Judge, follows:

This is a bill in equity to review the action of the Federal Prohibition Administrator, revolting the complainants permit to nse 36,-000 gallons of specially denatured alcohol per month for the manufacture of toilet water and hair tonic. There were two separate citations, one based upon title 2, § 5, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 14), notifying the permittee that, npon analysis, certain of his products were found not to corf respond with the descriptions and limitations provided by title 2, § 4 (27 USCA § 13); and the other…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Yudelson v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  3. Doran v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  4. Singer v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Barr Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API