Stein v. Doran
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of Kirkpatrick, District Judge, follows:
This is a bill in equity to review the action of the Federal Prohibition Administrator, revolting the complainants permit to nse 36,-000 gallons of specially denatured alcohol per month for the manufacture of toilet water and hair tonic. There were two separate citations, one based upon title 2, § 5, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 14), notifying the permittee that, npon analysis, certain of his products were found not to corf respond with the descriptions and limitations provided by title 2, § 4 (27 USCA § 13); and the other…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Yudelson v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- Doran v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Singer v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pennington v. Barr Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941