Wellock v. Cowan

The facts in this case were stated at some length on a former review in this court (228 Mich. 575), and need not be here repeated. It was then held that “the court should have instructed the jury that Cowan signed the bill of sale and as to plaintiff Cowan & Binkle were partners.” A new trial has been had, and defendants now seek review by writ of error.

The bill of sale, given as a security however, covered the following property:

“All the stock of hardware, harness and implements belonging to us and now in our possession in our place of business in the village of Deckerville, Michigan. ’ ’

The…