Legal Opinion
State v. Title Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1936No. 30,889PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The state appeals from an order denying its motion for new trial. The issue involved is whether defendant is under the law required to pay moneys and credits and general personal property taxes in addition to those imposed upon and paid by it as a title insurance company.
The facts are simple. As found by the court they may be summarized in this fashion: Defendant is a title insurance company organized and functioning under and pursuant to 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 3315(a)(7). Counsel so stipulated, and the court so found. In order to function as such it owns and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- County of Todd v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- American Railway Express Co. v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- City of St. Paul v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- County of Hennepin v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Tempe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Westover v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936