Legal Opinion
Dinko v. Wall
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1976No. 75 Civ. 524 (HFW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
This case was remanded to me by the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.1
Upon the original motion to vacate an order authorizing this action I dismissed the complaint upon the grounds that the plaintiff had not made a sufficient demand (the Court of Appeals reversed this conclusion) and that the plaintiff had not shown “good cause.”
Before the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case there was no existing definition of good cause as required by Title 29, section 501(b) LMRDA.
A definition has now been furnished in the following…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Loretangeli v. CritelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Loretangeli v. CritelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Morrissey v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Dinko v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Greenberg v. Moving Picture Machine Operators Union Local 306District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.