Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Moving Picture Machine Operators Union Local 306

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 30, 1984No. M 52Published

1Opinion of the Court

*631ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff has applied pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 501(c) for leave to file a complaint alleging violations of 29 U.S.C. .§ 501(c). Plaintiffs burden at this stage is to make a good cause showing that certain of the individual defendants (“the defendants”) breached their fiduciary duties to the Motion Picture Machine Operators Union Local 306 (“Local 306”), of which they are officers, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 501(a).

Plaintiff alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty to Local 306 by issuing a written communication on May 11, 1984 (the “May 11 letter”),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dinko v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Dinko v. WallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API