Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weakley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2009No. 1054 MDA 2007, 1052 MDA 2007PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania files this consolidated appeal1 from the pre-trial order2 entered in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, which granted defense motions in limine by Ap-pellees Paul R. Weakley (“Weakley”) and Hugo M. Selenski (“Selenski”) to exclude evidence of subsequent other crimes from admission at their criminal homicide trial. Because we find the other crime so distinctive in its manner of execution and so similar to the charged crime as to be admissible for the purpose of showing identity, we reverse.

Facts Related to Homicides

¶ 2 The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. TorresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API