Commonwealth v. Weakley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania files this consolidated appeal1 from the pre-trial order2 entered in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, which granted defense motions in limine by Ap-pellees Paul R. Weakley (“Weakley”) and Hugo M. Selenski (“Selenski”) to exclude evidence of subsequent other crimes from admission at their criminal homicide trial. Because we find the other crime so distinctive in its manner of execution and so similar to the charged crime as to be admissible for the purpose of showing identity, we reverse.
Facts Related to Homicides
¶ 2 The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. TorresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.