Legal Opinion

Westman v. Brumm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 33,736PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, 81 and 77 years old respectively, born in Sweden, in this country nearly 43 years, of very limited knowledge and experience respecting business of the character here attempted by them, owning 26 shares of capital stock of Consumers Power Company valued at $2,600, exchanged it, at the solicitation of defendant, a stock salesman, for 55 shares of capital stock of Foulds Company, and paid to boot $95 in cash. Plaintiffs accepted four dividend checks from the Foulds Company. Claiming to have been defrauded in the exchange, they brought this suit.

Trial was without a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. KunkleMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Donovan v. CurtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Stowe v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dehring v. Northern Mich. Exploration Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Harrigan v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Valley Die Cast Corp. v. A.C.W., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Mock v. DukeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Lash v. ProkopMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API