Legal Opinion
Teamster Local Union No. 714 v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 6, 2007No. 06 C 6695, 06 C 6696PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Teamster Local Union No. 714 (“Teamsters,” treated as a singular collective noun) brought each of these actions under Labor Management Relations Act § 301 (29 U.S.C. § 185), seeking to compel two employers — GES Exposition Services, Inc. (“GES”) and Freeman Decorating Services, Inc. (“Freeman”), collectively “Employers” — to arbitrate certain work assignment disputes pursuant to Teamsters’ collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) with each employer. Teamsters has now moved in each action for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,029 Ruth Elizabeth McCormick Tankersley v. Joseph M. P. Albright and Josephine P. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Sandra Ethel McCowen v. William Jamieson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Local 1351 International Longshoremens Ass'n v. Sea-Land Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ochs v. HindmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Capital One Equipment Finance Corp. v. Bonus Taxi, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019