Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Chicago, Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Calhoun District Court: — Hon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action for the value of two horses killed in a collision with defendant’s engine resulted in a directed verdict for the defendant and judgment thereon. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The defendant’s track passed through the farm occupied by plaintiff as a tenant. There was a private crossing, and in the afternoon of January 4, 1911, shortly before 4 o’clock, plaintiff’s son and an employee undertook to take six head of horses from the barnyard over this crossing into the cornstalk field beyond. Three of the horses escaped and ran down the track, but, as the train approached, turned back, and two of them were killed by the engine about sixty rods from the crossing. The day was clear. Snow covered the ground at considerable depth on both sides of the track. For a mile and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Farrell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Tarashonsky ex rel. Tarashonsky v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Mears v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Christiansen v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago G. W. R. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API