Legal Opinion

David v. Southern Import Wine Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1936No. 16481PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

Joseph B. David, as assignee of Julius H.. Wiener, an attorney and notary practicing in this city, claims of Southern Import Wine Company, Inc., $300 alleging that to be the amount due by said defendant to said Wiener for notarial and legal services rendered in connection with the incorporation of the said wine company. Defendant simultaneously pleaded the prescription of one year as established by article 3534 of the Civil Code, exceptions ■of vagueness and no cause of action, and also denied categorically the allegations ■of plaintiff’s petition and alleged a special defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Interstate Electric Co. v. Frank Adam Electric Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Bradshaw v. KnollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. Chaffe v. Barataria Canning Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Johnson v. Manget Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Marchand v. Loan & Pledge Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ong Hing v. Arizona Harness Raceway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Louisiana State Mineral Board v. AlbaradoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. Arctic Slope Native Ass'n v. PaulAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lane-Wells Co. v. Ladak Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Louisiana State Mineral Board v. AlbaradoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API