Holz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
Defendant is a common carrier by railway, engaged in both interstate and intrastate transportation of passengers and freight. Plaintiff was employed as a brakeman or switchman in defendant’s yards at Dubuque, Iowa. He ivas injured there ivhile between two freight cars, engaged in opening by hand the coupler on one of these cars, and brings the action to recover for the personal injury sustained. He bases his action upon the federal safety appliance act and employers liability act, U. S. C.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PRR CO. v. LinehanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Kramer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. GentleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Devaney v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.