Legal Opinion
Mellman v. Sprint Communications Co.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided August 30, 1996No. 1:96-cv-00119PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAUL, Chief Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to remand (Doc. 14). Defendant has filed a response in opposition to Plaintiffs motion (Doe. 17). For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff is suing Defendant under a breach of contract theory for certain changes made by Defendant in its “Fridays Free” long distance program. According to the complaint, on or about April 5, 1996, Defendant “telephonically solicited Plaintiff to change his long distance carrier to Defendants [sic] Company.” Defendant’s representative allegedly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Aronson v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Letner v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2001
- Brown v. Washington/Baltimore Cellular, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Guglielmo v. WorldCom et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000