Swift & Co. v. Bleise
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Baker, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Hastings, C.
Thirty-seven assignments of error are made in this case. Comparatively few of them, however, are urged by counsel, and only those will be considered. The first is that the petition does not state a cause of action, for the reason that it is nowhere alleged that the foreman, Fred Apel, had authority or control over the plaintiff, or that it was any part of his duty to operate the elevator in question. The defendant company says that such an allegation Avas necessary to disclose a right of action against it. The plaintiff’s claim in this action is that he was ordered by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoosac Mining & Milling Co. v. DonatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Todd v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Burnham v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Watkins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Colton v. BenesNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Beresford v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- United States v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.