Legal Opinion
Heusle v. National Mutual Insurance
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 1979No. Civ. 78-1036PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
Patti A. Heusle and her parents, George and Joyce Heusle, filed this action against the National Mutual Insurance Company, Celina Group, (National Mutual) and the Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) seeking recovery of certain insurance benefits to which Patti A. Heusle claims entitlement under policies of insurance issued on behalf of her parents and on behalf of Yvonne DiStasi. The United States of America, the United States Coast Guard and the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare have been joined as involuntary Plaintiffs or in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Surety Corporation, a Corporation of the State of New York v. The Midland Bank, a Corporation of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Singer v. SheppardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. SheppardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heusle v. National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Boswell v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Nationwide Insurance v. Frazier, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1986
- United States Court of Appeals, Third CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980