Legal Opinion

Kerr v. B F Goodrich Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1936No. 2777PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*686OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

Plaintiff, Bertram Kerr, an infant, brought suit by his father, as next friend, to recover damages for personal injuries abeged to have .been sustained by him in a collision between the automobile in which he was riding as a passenger, and an automobile of defendant, admittedly driven by defendant’s agent.

Numerous specifications of negligence were set forth, the principal of which were excessive speed of defendant’s car immediately before and at the time of the collision, and failure of the driver of defendant’s car to have the same under control, and to keep a lookout…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrockhausSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Machamer v. WarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States of America, Ex Rel. Silvio De Vita v. Lloyd W. McCorkle Principal Keeper of the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. Kerby v. HiestermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Dayton v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Steiner v. CusterOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel. Silvio De Vita v. Lloyd W. McCorkle Principal Keeper of the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API