Legal Opinion

White v. . Morris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants say that at the time this action was instituted and judgment obtained against them they were aged, respectively, 7 and 9 years, and that no defense was made for them, as they are informed and believe; that they were without general guardian; that they were never served with process and never had a day in court to make their defense; that the court failed to appoint a guardian ad litem for them, as required by law, and no defense was made for them; that no issues were submitted to a jury, as required by law; that a jury trial was not waived; that the judgment was "irregular and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Henry v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Williamson v. . HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. State v. . RickettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Orange Speedway, Inc. v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Russell v. HackettTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hughes v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rogers v. DavenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Blades v. SpitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API