Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Macartney

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to have certain real estate impressed with a trust.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This action is brought to have certain real estate impressed with a trust in favor of the plaintiffs. *76It appears from the evidence that the plaintiffs and the defendant are the daughters and sole heirs-at-law of George B. Macartney and of his wife Agnes Macartney, now both dead, and both of whom died intestate.

On or about the 23d day of June, 1896, the said George B. Macartney was the owner of a house and lot known as Mo. 107 Tenth street, in the city of Buffalo; and his wife, Agnes Macartney, was the owner of three other houses and lots on the same street, known as Mos. 106, 112 and 113. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shakespeare v. . MarkhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Goldsmith v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Ford v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Boyd v. . De La MontagnieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Garfield v. . HatmakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dressel v. HanserNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Schmitz v. SchmitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Hibbard v. HibbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API