Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Doe

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1985No. 16637PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRAW, Justice:

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in the underlying action, Wilma Mae Lusk and Paul Lusk, her husband, from an order of the Circuit Court of Wyoming County entered on March 29, 1984, sustaining a motion to dismiss sought in behalf of the unknown defendant below, denominated as John Doe. The basis for the circuit court’s dismissal was its conclusion that the plaintiffs had failed to comply with a statutory prerequisite to the bringing of a “John Doe” action as provided in West Virginia’s uninsured motorist coverage provisions.

The pertinent circumstances leading up to this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Chapman v. Kane Transfer Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Squire v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. John Doe v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  5. Munoz v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BroadnaxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Perkins v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hamric v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hartwell v. MarquezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Plumley v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API