Legal Opinion

State v. Vietz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 26, 1999No. 22058-0-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, C.J.

— We are asked to decide whether actions taken and statements given to a licensed practical nurse (LPN) by a criminal defendant are privileged under the nurse-patient privilege statute. We hold that the statute does not apply to LPNs. Thus, testimony regarding Stephen Vietz’s statements and his handing over of a baggie containing methamphetamine is admissible. We affirm the conviction of possession of a controlled substance.

Vietz entered the emergency room of a hospital and told *872a LPN that he had something crawling in his blood. Because he was acting strangely, the LPN asked whether he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Drewett v. Rainier SchoolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. In Re Restraint of BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API