State v. Vietz
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, C.J.
— We are asked to decide whether actions taken and statements given to a licensed practical nurse (LPN) by a criminal defendant are privileged under the nurse-patient privilege statute. We hold that the statute does not apply to LPNs. Thus, testimony regarding Stephen Vietz’s statements and his handing over of a baggie containing methamphetamine is admissible. We affirm the conviction of possession of a controlled substance.
Vietz entered the emergency room of a hospital and told *872a LPN that he had something crawling in his blood. Because he was acting strangely, the LPN asked whether he was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Drewett v. Rainier SchoolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In Re Restraint of BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001