In re H.D.F.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Respondent-mother has three children with three different fathers. The trial court adjudicated the children as neglected and ordered custody of one child to his father and custody of the other two children to remain with the Department of Social Services. From the adjudication and disposition orders, respondent-mother and respondent-father of one of the children in the custody of the Department of Social Services appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, dismiss in part, and reverse and remand in part.
I. Background
The trial court made the following pertinent findings…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of ShueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- BLACK HORSE RUN PROP. OWNERS ASSOCIATION-RALEIGH, INC. v. KaleelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Harris-Pittman v. Nash County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pearson v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- In re W.L.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re A.Y.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re: K.W. & M.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- In re: K.W. & M.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022