Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Hobbs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1994No. 93-50247PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Arthur Hobbs appeals his conviction based on a conditional guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Hobbs contends that the district court abused its discretion by precluding two defense witnesses from testifying at a suppression hearing after the witnesses violated a witness sequestration order. We have jurisdiction and we reverse.
I
Arthur Hobbs was arrested on the night of August 18, 1992 at a Los Angeles Amtrak train station. At this time, police officers searched his luggage and found a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. William Buffington, Ceariaco Cabrellis, and Booker T. Cook, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John F. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Troy Dennis Cropp, United States of America v. Clyde Garcia Cropp, United States of America v. Monte Clay MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Allen Ray JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Morris D. ENGLISH, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- People v. MelendezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.