Bank of Ashippun v. Ells
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The trial court held that plaintiff had waived its mortgage lien on the tractor and the evidence supports that conclusion. The bank permitted the tractor to be commingled with Bierman-Turnacliff’s other stock in trade without any mark indicating it was mortgaged property; it knew that it was necessary for Bierman-Turnacliff to sell its merchandise in order to remain in business; it checked the stock from time to time to see whether any of the mortgaged property had been sold. The note which the mortgage secured was due April 22, 1953. On July 7, 1953, by which time plaintiff knew that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoyt v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Carr v. BrawleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Diggle v. BouldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Southern Wisconsin Acceptance Co. v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Peterson v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burlington National Bank v. StraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Home Savings Bank v. MoskowitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963