Legal Opinion
Rousso v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 23, 2009No. 61779-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
204 P.3d 243 (2009)
Lee H. ROUSSO, an individual, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Washington, a government entity, Respondent.
No. 61779-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
March 23, 2009.
Lee H. Rousso, Green & Rousso PLLC, Renton, WA, for Appellant.
Jerry A. Ackerman, H. Bruce Marvin, Assistant Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
DWYER, A.C.J.
¶ 1 Lee Rousso is an amateur poker enthusiast. He enjoys playing poker in virtual card rooms on the Internet. After the legislature amended the state Gambling Act[1] by inserting the words "the internet" in the act's nonexclusive list of media…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Rousso v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Rousso v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2012