Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Hamilton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, from the Circuit Court of Shelby county; the Hon. Thomas M. Jett, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This was a bill filed by appellee, Mary E. Carnahan, to contest the will of her grandfather, Payton A. Bond, of whom she was the only heir-at-law. After an answer and replication were filed an issue of fact was submitted to the jury as to whether the instrument in question was the last will and testament of Payton A. Bond, deceased. The jury found in the negative. A motion for new trial was overruled and a decree entered in accordance with the verdict. Thereupon this appeal was prayed.

The will was executed on April 4, 1910, at which time Bond Was seventy-two years of age. He lived until May,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schneider v. ManningIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Woodman v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Rutherford v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Meeker v. MeekerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Dowie v. SuttonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Walker v. StruthersIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Teter v. SpoonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jackman v. NorthIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Noone v. OlehyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API