Roberto v. Ortiz v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1DissentKasold, Judge
Anyone reading the first few paragraphs of the facts as found by the Board and laid out in the majority opinion is left with a clear understanding that (1) Mr. Ortiz timely inquired about his appeal to the Board, (2) the RO either never received his appeal or lost it, and informed Mr. Ortiz that he must file a VA Form 1-9, (3) a frustrated Mr. Ortiz replied to the RO that he had already filed an appeal form and he wanted his appeal processed and wanted benefits for his “nervous condition,” later characterized by the Secretary as bipolar disorder. It is also clear from the facts as found by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Manio v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Howard F. Roberson, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- James E. Szemraj, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Phillip Andre, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.