Legal Opinion

In re Reinhart

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 30, 2016No. Case No. 16-21042-behPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION SUSTAINING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

Beth E. Hanan, United States Bankruptcy Judge

The Trustee has objected to confirmation of Mr. Reinhart’s Chapter 13 plan, asserting that the plan fails to pay all of Mr. Reinhart’s disposable income under 11 U.S.C. section 1325(b). Specifically, the Trustee asserts that Mr. Reinhart’s calcu-lation of his current monthly income (“CMI”) should have included reimburse-ments from his employer for mileage and meals, but not the corresponding expenses which prompted the reimbursements. Had only the reimbursement amounts been in-cluded, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blausey v. U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Drummond v. Wiegand (In Re Wiegand)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. In Re HornungUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API