Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Naegeli Reporting Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 15, 2008No. 35234-6-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Candy Singleton appeals from the trial court’s decision under CR 12(b)(6) that Naegeli Reporting Corporation was exempt under the Washington Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW. We hold that administrative regulations did not specifically permit the complained of actions (i.e., inflating the number of pages in its transcripts by adding tab spaces and inserting new paragraphs, which made the transcripts more expensive than they should have been) and thus do not qualify for exemption from the CPA. We reverse and remand for trial.

Bridgewater, J.

*601FACTS

¶2 In 2001, Candy Singleton…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. AOL, LLC v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Aol, LLC v. Washington State Dept.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Nichols v. Peterson Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Walker v. WENATCHEE VALLEY TRUCK & AUTO OUTLETCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API