Russell v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The law firm of Troutman and Trout-man, P.C. (the Troutman firm), as real party in interest, appeals from a district-court order awarding attorney fees in an amount less than it requested under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). We review the award for an abuse of discretion. See Hubbard v. Shalala, 12 F.3d 946, 947 (10th Cir.1993), abrogated on other grounds by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002); see also McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 505 (10th Cir.2006). Of course, we review de novo any issues of law, such as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Wrenn Ex Rel. Wrenn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- ZINNA v. CongroveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Blackburn v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- Brandon Cook v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Brown v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Brown v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Firment v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.