Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davenport Pastures, LP v. Morris County Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 10, 2010No. 98,342Published

1ConcurrenceBiles, J.

I also agree with the court’s analysis that inevitably leads to this conclusion. I write separately only to emphasize that under these facts and the statute directing these proceedings, this was not a close case.

From the outset, it must be recognized that K.S.A. 68-102a necessarily creates an inherent conflict of interest for county commissioners. On the one hand, the statute charges commissioners with determining the monetary damages owed by their county to a private citizen whose land abuts a public roadway now abandoned by the county. On the other, the commissioners have statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. McPherson Landfill, Inc. v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Davenport Pastures, LP v. Morris County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. Davenport Pasture, LP v. MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF MORRIS COUNTY COMM'RSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API