Legal Opinion
Stephenson v. Office of Personnel Management
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 18, 2013No. 2012-3074PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation arising from 5 U.S.C. § 8452 and section 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423. Pursuant to § 8452, the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) must reduce a Federal Employees Retirement System (“FERS”) disability retirement annuity for any month in which the recipient is also “entitled” to Social Security Administration (“SSA”) disability benefits under section 223. Kelly L. Stephenson petitions for review of a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”), which affirmed a decision by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Ramona H. Kindall v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Montelongo v. OpmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Braun v. HhsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Gibson v. OpmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Manuel Lampon-Paz v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018