Legal Opinion
John T. Riddell, Inc. v. Athletic Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 15, 1934No. 5243PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Appellee was charged by appellant with infringement of two combination patents issued to John T. Riddell, No. 1,462,625, hereinafter referred to as the “clamp” patent, issued July 24, 1923, for an “athletic shoe”; and No. 1,659,666, hereinafter referred to as the “plate” patent, issued February 21,1928, for “Athlctic-Shoe Construction.” The defense was invalidity and non-infringement. The court found both patents invalid and dismissed the bill for wane of equity, and from that decree this appeal is prosecuted.
The clamp patent relates to a football shoe having molded…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ainsworth v. Gill Glass & Fixture Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- John T. Riddell, Inc. v. P. Goldsmith Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Western Lithograph Co. v. W. H. Brady Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947