Legal Opinion

Rabbia v. Rocha

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 29, 2011No. 2010-296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The plaintiff, Salvatore Rabbia, appeals an order of the Superior Court {Sullivan, J.) directing that $37,000 plus interest currently being held in escrow be dispersed to the intervenor, Automotive Finance Corporation, instead of to the plaintiff, and denying the plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

I. Background

Before going out of business in 2008, the corporate defendant, Harvard Auto Sales, Inc., d/b/a Hitcars.com (Harvard Auto), and its principals, defendants Max E. Rocha and Evangelos Karagianis, were in the salvage motor vehicle business.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. In Re SaleskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. George v. Al Hoyt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. In Re ScottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Bendetson v. Killarney, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Atkinson v. Malborn Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  2. Bosonetto v. Town of RichmondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Jeffrey Roy v. Quality Pro Auto, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Zimmerling v. Affinity Financial Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Senay Akin and Nedim SuljevicSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API