Legal Opinion
Town of Atkinson v. Malborn Realty Trust
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 17, 2012No. 2011-085PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The respondents, Malborn Realty Trust and its trustee, Daniel Osborn, appeal an order of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) that enjoined Osborn from occupying property in Atkinson because he lacks an occupancy permit and that imposed a civil penalty for this violation. See RSA 676:15 (2008), :17 (Supp. 2011). The petitioner, Town of Atkinson (Town), cross-appeals the trial court’s failure to award it attorney’s fees. See RSA 676:17, II. We affirm the trial court’s issuance of the injunction, modify its imposition of civil penalties, reverse its denial of attorney’s fees, and remand.
*65The trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Simpson v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services v. MottoloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Appeal of AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- South Willow Properties, LLC v. Burlington Coat Factory of New Hampshire, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Thomas v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Case v. St. Mary's BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Strike Four, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- City of Keene v. James Cleaveland & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Evans v. J Four Realty, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- In re HeinrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.