Legal Opinion

Sentenne v. Kelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Edward H. Sentenne against Horace R. Kelly. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and from the judgment entered thereon defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This action was brought to recover $1,431.90, for breach of-' the following contract: “Hew York, April 27th, 1887.

“Hew York Land Blast Works: You are hereby authorized to manufacture for us fifteen hundred (1,500) embossed glass signs; size, seven by nine, framed in like sample, and worded as follows, to-wit: [Like sample.] Eight-hundred to be delivered as soon as possible, balance within eighteen months,for which we agree to pay two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for 1,500 signs, [Signed] “Horace R. Kelly & Co.”

The defenses interposed were that the signs delivered were not like sample, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dwight v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Brady v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Tobias v. . LissbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. House v. HornburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. First Nat. Bank of Litchfield v. Pipe & Contractors' Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. National Cash Register Co. v. McCannNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  5. G. H. Hammond Co. v. Diego Agüeros & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API