Kalen v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Vigo Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, J. —
The complaint of the appellant against the appellee consisted of two paragraphs. A demurrer to each paragraph was sustained.
In the first paragraph, after introductory averments describing the appellee and its railroad, it was alleged, in substance, that where the appellee’s road crosses Seventh street, in the corporation limits of the city of Terre Haute, the appellee, some time prior to the commission of the injuries in this paragraph com*203plained of, erected and maintained on either side of its tracks, at said crossing, gates, and had ever since maintained such gates; that for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Coy v. Indianapolis Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Boston v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Simone v. the Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.