Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1971No. 45,773 and 45,774 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court'was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

These appeals are from convictions in separate cases which were consolidated for trial in the district court of Sedgwick County. The appeals have been consolidated for hearing in this court and we shall refer to them in the singular.

Defendant’s principal ground for reversel is that consolidation of the cases, under the circumstances shown to exist, amounted to prejudicial error.

The two cases having been tried together over the timely protest of defendant, our inquiry on appellate review is whether the record indicates sufficient possibility of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Roberts v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Harold S. Cross v. United States of America, John L. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. State v. Cameron & BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State v. BunyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API