TM Doyle Teaming Co., Inc. v. Freels
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendant, Allen L. Freels (“Freels”) for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, on the complaint of plaintiff, T.M. Doyle Teaming Co., Inc. (“Doyle”). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. 1
Rule 56(c) provides that summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Palace Bar, Inc. v. FearnotIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McKinney v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- McKinney v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Suzue v. BaumgartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996