Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Zimmon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]) (see, e.g., Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tonello v. Carborundum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Migliaccio v. Phoenix InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Corrado v. BendellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Scarborough v. ZimmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Scarborough v. ZimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API