Scarborough v. Zimmon
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]) (see, e.g., Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tonello v. Carborundum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Migliaccio v. Phoenix InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Corrado v. BendellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Scarborough v. ZimmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Scarborough v. ZimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.