Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Zimmon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant doctors David Zimmon and William Panke appeal from an order compelling them to accept plaintiffs’ late complaint. Although defendants failed to move for dismissal of the action against them pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]), we believe dismissal is warranted because plaintiffs failed to timely comply with defendants’ demand for a complaint and also failed to demonstrate merit and a reasonable excuse for the three-month delay (cf. A & J Concrete Corp. v Arker, 54 NY2d 870). Plaintiffs’ inability to obtain the services…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A & J Concrete Corp. v. ArkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Scarborough v. ZimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Scarborough v. ZimmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Courell v. KurznerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Sammons v. FreerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API