Legal Opinion

Siders v. Gibbs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1976No. 7614SC26PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in considering defendant Gibbs’ affidavit verifying his answer since it was filed on the date of the summary judgment hearing, and this Court ruled in Insurance Co. v. Chantos, 21 N.C. App. 129, 203 S.E. 2d 421 (1974), that affidavits in support of summary judgment must be filed before the date of hearing. The purpose of the Chantos ruling is to prevent unfair surprise. There is no question of unfair surprise in this case since the affidavit merely verified defendant Gibbs’ previously filed answer and added no new matters to the case.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. ChantosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Green v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Randall v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Doggett v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API