Messina v. East Penn Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
In this land use appeal, we consider whether a municipality failed to comply with certain procedural requirements for enactment of a zoning ordinance as set forth in the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), 1 and whether any failure to do so resulted in a denial of procedural due process so as to render a zoning ordinance enacted 12 years earlier void ab initio, 2 Upon review, we conclude the challengers to the zoning ordinance, who declined the offer of a hearing on their procedural validity challenge, did not prove the existence of a procedural defect…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Iowa Central Railway Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- D.Z. v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Messina v. East Penn TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- McLaughlin v. Forty Fort BoroughDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Oxford Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Bartkowski Investment Group, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Marple TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.