Legal Opinion

Hagan v. State Ex Rel. Batchelor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 1922No. 1 Div. 226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

In reference to the tick eradication activities of the state and of the county of Mobile, the board of revenue and road commissioners took this action on October 3, 1921:

“That the dipping season end October 15 [1921], and that all activities connected therewith cease, and that all appropriations of funds for tick eradication be discontinued on October 15, 1921.”

On October 10, 1921, notice of this action was communicated by the board’s clerk to the Mobile county federal and state agents or officers engaged in this branch of the live stock health service; and also notice of the fact that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Thomas v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Mobile Mutual Insurance v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. State ex rel. City of Birmingham v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Mobile County v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gaston v. CunninghameSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. VinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Cary v. Commissioners' Court of Clarke CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API