Legal Opinion

Kingsland v. Factory Mutual System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: At oral argument, plaintiffs asserted that they were pursuing only the negligence cause of action. Accordingly, we do not address the propriety of Special Term’s order relating to other causes of action alleged in the complaint. We conclude that Special Term erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

"[0]ne who assumes to act, even though gratuitously, may thereby become subject to the duty of acting carefully, if he acts at all”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Home Mutual Insurance v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Gerace v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  4. James v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. MATTER OF JAMES v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hines v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Jansen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. McNulty v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Moors v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API