Moors v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, CPLR 3211 [c]; 3212; see also, Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Gold-stein v County of Monroe, 77 AD2d 232). Plaintiff’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a factual issue concerning whether defendant had assumed a duty to him to instruct him properly and whether the alleged breach of that duty left plaintiff in a more vulnerable position than he otherwise would have been in, thereby contributing to his injury (cf., Jansen v Fidelity & Cas.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Goldstein v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Jansen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kingsland v. Factory Mutual SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988