Legal Opinion

Moors v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, CPLR 3211 [c]; 3212; see also, Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Gold-stein v County of Monroe, 77 AD2d 232). Plaintiff’s affidavit was sufficient to raise a factual issue concerning whether defendant had assumed a duty to him to instruct him properly and whether the alleged breach of that duty left plaintiff in a more vulnerable position than he otherwise would have been in, thereby contributing to his injury (cf., Jansen v Fidelity & Cas.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Goldstein v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Jansen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Kingsland v. Factory Mutual SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API