Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haines v. Taft

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 26, 2019No. A-13 September Term 2017; A-14 September Term 2017; 079600Published

1DissentJustice Albin

Today's opinion will have a catastrophic impact on the right of low-income automobile accident victims to recover their medical costs from the wrongdoers who cause their injuries. The decision **296leaves innocent automobile accident victims without the legal right to sue negligent and reckless drivers for recovery of their unpaid medical bills -- medical bills that will bankrupt some and financially crush others. The majority's mistaken interpretation of *278N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 will widen the divide among economic classes in our civil justice system.

N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 is intended to prevent a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Wytupeck v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API