Legal Opinion

Fullilove v. Beame

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1979PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this case as well as in Matter of Fullilove v Carey (48 NY2d 826), the fundamental question presented is not whether affirmative action is permissible or desirable. The question, simply and narrowly, is whether, under our governmental system, the central feature of which is distribution of powers, the executive has the authority to initiate affirmative action without legislative authorization.

Although the rule elsewhere may differ, the law in New York is clear.

The State Legislature, as well as the New York City Council, has unequivocally condemned discriminatory hiring…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broidrick v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fullilove v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

4Cited by36 opinions

  1. New York State Chapter, Inc. v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Subcontractors Trade Ass'n v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. New York State Health Facilities Ass'n v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. SN Nielsen Co. v. PUBLIC BUILDING COMM'N OF CHICAGOIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United Fence & Guard Rail Corp. v. Mario M. Cuomo, Franklin E. White, Horace M. Flowers, Howard L. SheffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API