Legal Opinion
Fullilove v. Carey
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 798; see, also, Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, decided herewith).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer dissent *828and vote to reverse (see dissenting opn by Fuchsberg, J., in Matter of Fullilove v Beame, 48 NY2d 376, decided herewith).
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fullilove v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Fullilove v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Subcontractors Trade Ass'n v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fullilove v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- United Fence & Guard Rail Corp. v. Mario M. Cuomo, Franklin E. White, Horace M. Flowers, Howard L. SheffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v. ShahNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Rex Paving Corp. v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.