Legal Opinion

Eagle Stevedores, Inc. v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1962No. 62-36PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Judge.

Appellee, plaintiff below, while standing near a lunch truck in. a street end or extension located in a harbor dock area, was struck and injured by a small motor operated vehicle referred to as a “tow-motor.” The vehicle was owned by the corporate defendant and operated by the individual defendant with the former’s knowledge and consent. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plain*552tiff for $7,500. .On appeal it is contended that the dangerous instrumentality doctrine as referable to motor vehicles1 was not applicable because the vehicle involved was not licensed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Lynch v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  3. Burns v. McDanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Herbert v. GarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Singleton v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meister v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Harding v. Allen-Laux, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Rippy v. ShepardSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Canull v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Meister v. FisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API