Eagle Stevedores, Inc. v. Thomas
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, Judge.
Appellee, plaintiff below, while standing near a lunch truck in. a street end or extension located in a harbor dock area, was struck and injured by a small motor operated vehicle referred to as a “tow-motor.” The vehicle was owned by the corporate defendant and operated by the individual defendant with the former’s knowledge and consent. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plain*552tiff for $7,500. .On appeal it is contended that the dangerous instrumentality doctrine as referable to motor vehicles1 was not applicable because the vehicle involved was not licensed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Lynch v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Burns v. McDanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Herbert v. GarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Singleton v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meister v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Harding v. Allen-Laux, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Rippy v. ShepardSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Canull v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Meister v. FisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.